Fig 1: Mean values ± SEM of salivary levels of Gustin protein (µg/µL) for STs, MTs, and NTs (A) and for volunteers with genotypes AA, AG, and GG (B) of Gustin polymorphism rs2274333 (A/G) n = 66. Different letters indicate a significant difference (p ≤ 0.037; Fisher LSD test after one-way ANOVA).
Fig 2: Pearson linear correlation analysis between the salivary levels of Gustin protein (µg/µL) and ∆Ct values. (A) Relationship in the whole sample (r = 0.304; p = 0.015). (B) Relationships in the three Gustin genotype groups (genotype AA: r = 0.380; p = 0.018; genotype AG: r = 0.152; p > 0.05; genotype GG: r = 0.201; p > 0.05). (C) Relationships in the three PROP taster groups (ST: r = 0.490; p = 0.011; MT: r = 0.056; p > 0.05; NT: r = 0.127; p > 0.05). n = 66.
Fig 3: The two CpG sites (cg06962067 and cg00198750) interrogated by MethyLight assay in the region (chr1:8945775-8945902, hg38) upstream of the coding sequence (CDS) of the Gustin gene are located 36 bp and 33 bp upstream of the ATG. The figure is modified from UCSC genome browser.
Fig 4: Mean values ± SEM of the density of fungiform papillae (No./cm2) of volunteers with AA, AG, and GG genotypes of Gustin polymorphism rs2274333 (A/G). n = 66. Different letters indicate a significant difference (p = 0.019; Fisher LSD test after one-way ANOVA).
Supplier Page from R&D Systems, a Bio-Techne Brand for Carbonic Anhydrase VI Protein
Available conjugates: Sizes Available: 10 ug