Not the best antibody for CD4 expression

Cancer Immunology & AIDS
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Research Fellow

Overall

Quality of Results

Ease-of-Optimization

What do these ratings mean?
Write a Review

Company:

BioLegend

Product Name:

PerCP/Cy5.5 anti-human CD4 Antibody

Catalog Number:

317428

I have used this antibody for analyzing the fraction of CD4+ve T cells in a human PBMC derived T cell pool. The human T cells were purified from PBMCs using a magnetic bead based separation method, followed by staining with anti-human CD4 (OKT4) mAb conjugated to the PERCP-Cy5.5 fluorophore. The cells were analyzed using flow cytometry. The staining shows two separate populations of CD4+ve and CD4-ve cells, but the separation is not very clear. Also, there is a population with intermediate CD4 expression, which is unusual. The frequencies are lower than physiologically relevant populations and thus, it may not be the best fluorophore to use for surface staining.

Experimental Design and Results Summary

Applications

Flow Cytometry

Sample

Human T cells purified from PBMCs

Primary Incubation

1:100 dilution for 30 minutes on ice

Blocking Agent

NA

Secondary Incubation

NA

Tertiary Incubation

NA

Detection

Flow cytometry on PERCP channel

Results Summary

The staining does separate the positive and negative populations, but not very clearly. There is also some background staining coming up as an intermediate population which makes it difficult to interpret the results. I have used the mAb clone OKT4 several times before for detection of human CD4 and it works pretty well. So, my suggestion is to use a different fluorophore than PERCP for staining.

Additional Notes

None

Related Categories

Image Gallery

Summary

The Good

It does the job

The Bad

The separation is not very clear. Not a reccomended fluorophore.

The Bottom Line

It works fine for the purpose, but does not produce publication quality data. I would use this only when I have no other choice for a fluorophore.

Share your experience with other scientists. Write a Review! »

Join the discussion