Researchers from Johns Hopkins Medicine have identified key molecular differences between breast cancer cells that cling to an initial tumor and those that venture off to form distant tumors—findings that could pave the way for new treatments that target those specific variations.

The findings are particularly relevant for those suffering from triple negative breast cancer. Such cells lack molecular flags on its surface that connect with the hormones estrogen and progesterone and a cancer growth-promoting protein called Her2-neu. Many current breast cancer therapies work by targeting those flags. An estimated 10–20% of the 280,000 breast cancers diagnosed in the United States each year are triple negative. The rate is higher among African American women, who are twice as likely to experience this form of the disease.

Search Antibodies
Search Now Use our Antibody Search Tool to find the right antibody for your research. Filter
by Type, Application, Reactivity, Host, Clonality, Conjugate/Tag, and Isotype.

“We have long needed new treatment targets and options for triple negative breast cancers,” says Andrew Ewald, Ph.D., the Virginia DeAcetis Professor in Basic Science Research and Director, Department of Cell Biology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and co-leader of the Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Program at the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center. “These cancers often return within three years of diagnosis, and treatments used for other breast cancers don’t typically work for triple negative.”

For the current study, the research team looked at molecular differences between initial, or primary, triple-negative breast cancer sites and areas where it spread, or metastatic sites, among three different types of cells: mouse models, human cancers implanted into mice and samples of both primary and metastatic tissues taken from eight patients treated at The Johns Hopkins Hospital. The researchers used a combination of machine learning, cellular imaging, and biochemical analysis to identify differences in the genetic expression patterns of initial and metastatic tumors.

They found that cells from metastatic sites are “super optimized” for migration and resisting treatment, says Ewald. “The good news is that we identified several proteins called transcription factors that these cells require to handle the challenges of migrating and thriving at metastatic sites, and we may be able to design new therapies that target these transcription factors.”

Ewald and colleagues found several unique properties in the cells of mice engineered to have the mouse-version of triple negative breast cancers, and mice implanted with tumors from people with triple negative breast cancer.  They report that, when triple negative breast cancer cells invade other tissues on their way to another part of the body, they gain two cellular properties: better movement and survival. To do this, breast cancer cells gain a cellular skeleton protein dubbed vimentin, which enhances the migratory ability of so-called mesenchymal cells, a cell type typically found in bones and bone marrow that moves around and makes new cells.

Triple negative breast cancer cells also gain survival advantages by producing a protein called E-cadherin, typically found in epithelial cells that line the ducts and coverings of organs and frequently renew themselves.

When triple negative breast cancer cells gain such survival and migratory qualities, scientists classify their cellular state as so-called hybrid epithelial mesenchymal (EMT) cells.

To look more closely at molecules involved in hybrid EMT states, the group brought in Elana Fertig, Ph.D., division director and associate director of quantitative sciences and co-director of the Convergence Institute at the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, to track the molecular patterns of individual cells in cell assays that model invasion out of the primary tumor and formation of a colony in a metastatic site. Fertig’s computational team used machine learning techniques to find patterns among each cell’s expression of RNA, a cousin of DNA involved in protein production. The scientists found that most of the metastatic cells morph into the more mobile, better surviving, hybrid EMT state.

Ewald’s team then validated these states in samples from eight patients with triple negative tumors, examining both primary tumors and tissues from metastatic sites of the same patients.  At the molecular level, the most metastatic cells produced five proteins called transcription factors (Grhl2, Foxc2, Zeb1, Zeb2 and Ovol1) that foster the making of proteins involved in either cancer cell invasion or colony formation.

“The molecular differences between metastatic and primary tumors are likely the reason why metastatic tumor cells are so resistant to current treatments,” says Ewald.

Ewald’s team is now studying ways to block the transcription factors’ genes or their resulting proteins to halt metastatic cancer growth as well as whether the same molecular and cellular changes happen in other cancers, such as those in the colon, adrenal glands, stomach, and small intestine.

The findings were published recently in the journal Science Translational Medicine.