Researchers in London have added to the growing body of evidence that non-coding, or “junk,” DNA is not inert as previously believed and can contribute to the development of cancer. The findings may eventually lead to better drugs and treatments.
Non-coding DNA makes up about half of the human genome. And while it was known that such junk DNA could impede replication of the genome, the underlying mechanism was poorly understood.
In the new study, scientists at charity and research organization The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) reconstituted the entire process of DNA replication in a test tube. They were then able to describe how repetitive patterns of DNA are copied during replication and how they are able to stall replication entirely—increasing the risk of errors that can be an early driver of cancer.
Search Antibodies Search Now Use our Antibody Search Tool to find the right antibody for your research. Filter
by Type, Application, Reactivity, Host, Clonality, Conjugate/Tag, and Isotype.
The researchers believe the work could also help to improve the diagnosis and monitoring of some cancers, such as bowel cancer, where common errors in copying the repetitive sequences of DNA indicate whether cancer is progressing.
The study, published in Nature Communications, found that when the DNA replication machinery encountered repetitive DNA, it was able to unwind the DNA strands, but it sometimes failed to copy the opposite DNA strand. This error could cause replication to stall, resulting in collapse of the replication machinery in a manner similar to that induced by DNA damage.
The findings lead scientists to believe that repetitive DNA sequences could trigger a damage response signal indicating that errors in DNA replication have occurred and require repair. DNA damage and ensuing genome instability are known to promote cancer formation and progression, so the research strengthens the link between junk DNA and cancer. The team hopes that improved understanding of DNA replication, and how it can go wrong, might lead to new ways of treating the disease.
“We wanted to understand why it seems more difficult for cells to copy repetitive DNA sequences than other parts of the genome,” says study leader Dr Gideon Coster, Team Leader in Genome Replication at ICR. “Our study suggests that so-called junk DNA is actually playing an important and potentially damaging role in cells, by blocking DNA replication and potentially opening the door to cancerous mutations. We now believe that repetitive DNA sequences trigger a response that is very similar to the one induced by DNA damage, which we know can lead to cancer. Our study therefore fundamentally advances our understanding of cancer, and I’m hopeful it will help us come up with new treatments in the future.”
Professor Kristian Helin, Chief Executive of ICR, said the mechanism could contribute to the development of cancer as a cause of genetic instability, “especially as cancer cells start dividing more quickly and so place the process of DNA replication under more stress. Understanding the mechanisms underlying genetic mutation and instability is critical if we are to find innovative new ways to treat cancer that exploit fundamental weaknesses in cancer cells.”
It was scientists at the ICR who, in the 1960s, provided the first conclusive evidence that DNA damage is the fundamental cause of cancer. In the early 2000s, ICR researchers then showed that drugs called PARP inhibitors could be genetically targeted against cancers with DNA repair mutations.