Fig 1: TM5275 attenuates MC903‐mediated itch, epidermal hyperplasia, and reduces the expression of Serpin E1, and OSM in the skin of MC903‐mice. (A) Immunocyte cell number in MC903‐mice treated with or without TM5275. Representative HE staining (B) and ear skin epidermal thickness analysis (C) in MC903‐mice with or without TM5275 treatment. (D) TM5275 attenuated itch‐like behavior in MC903‐mice. (A) RNA‐seq showing upregulation of transcripts of PLAUR, Serpin E1, OSMR, and OSM in ear skin from MC903‐mice. (F) Representative images showing T5275 reduced expression of Serpin E1 and OSM in ear skin from MC903‐mice. Data in A–C are means ± SEMs; All data in D,E are from n = 6–8 mice/group. For A, C and F, data are from (n ≥ 4 mice/group). For (E), ***FDR < 0.001. For A and C, N.S., p > 0.05, *p < 0.05, and ***p < .001, student t test; for (F), ***p < .001, one‐way ANOVA. (F) Schematic showing signaling pathways for PLAUR‐TLR2 in chronic itch. Serpin E1 receptor PLAUR and TLR2 are upregulated in AD skin from patients and mouse models. Serpin E1 activated PLAUR in TLR+‐neurons, leading to transcriptional upregulation of TLR2 and its co‐signaling proteins. TLR2 in turn promotes gene transcription of critical itch mediators including BNP and OSM, as well as AD‐associated PAR2. OSM induces acute itch‐like behaviors in mice and promotes inflammatory mediator release from human keratinocytes. Serpin E1 facilitates transcription/expression levels of Serpin E1 and OSM. This study uncovered that PLAUR is a new pruritogenic receptor in promoting AD itch. We propose targeting PLAUR represents a novel target for the therapeutic development of treating AD itch and skin inflammation
Fig 2: Knockdown of uPAR promotes fibrosis progression in vitro. (A, B) The knockdown efficiency of uPAR-siRNA in disease-derived fibroblasts was confirmed by western blot and qPCR. (C, D) mRNA level of α-SMA and type I collagen in three groups of cells. (E–H) Immunofluorescence staining of α-SMA and type I collagen in three groups of cells and their integrated density. scale bars, 100 μm, 20μm. (I) The proliferation ability after knocking down uPAR was evaluated by the cell counting kit 8. (J) Effect of knocking down uPAR on the contractility of fibroblasts. (K) The migration ability of fibroblasts after knocking down uPAR was evaluated by wound-healing assay. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001 when compared between the denoted groups.
Fig 3: Biological Effects of MIR143 Replacement or UPAR Knockdown In Vitro(A) Inhibition of PC-3 cell proliferation upon MIR143 replacement or UPAR knockdown. PC-3 cells were transfected with pre-MIR143, siRNA against UPAR, or the appropriate negative controls. At the indicated time points, cell proliferation was determined by BrdU incorporation. (B) Effects on cell density upon single or combined transfection of MIR143 and/or si-UPAR in DU-145 cells. Scale bar, 200 μm. Decreased numbers of cells were also associated with increased percentages of dead cells in (C) DU-145 and (D) PC-3 cells, as determined by propidium iodide staining in Celigo Imaging Cytometry. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (A) or as mean ± SD (C and D); *p < 0.05; **p < 0.03.
Fig 4: Ulinastatin reduces the expression of uPAR, NFATc1 and osteoclast marker genes induced by RANKL. C represents control group, R represents RANKL group, R + ulinastatin represents RANKL + 800 units/mL ulinastatin group. (A) Ulinastatin reduces RANKL-induced mRNA expression of cathepsin K, Trap, Rank, NFATc1, and uPAR. BMMs were cultured with M-CSF (30 ng/mL) and RANKL (100 ng/mL), and treated with or without ulinastatin (800 units/mL) for 4 days. mRNA expression was detected by qRT-PCR. The qRT-PCR experiments have been repeated with different RNA preparations for 3 times independently. Data are represented as mean ± SD. ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.01. (B,C,D) Ulinastatin reduces RANKL-induced protein expression of uPAR, cathepsin K and Trap. BMMs were cultured with M-CSF (30 ng/mL) and RANKL (100 ng/mL), and treated with or without ulinastatin (800 units/mL) for 2 or 4 days. Protein expression levels of uPAR, cathepsin K and Trap were examined by western blotting at the indicated times. The amount of loaded protein was 25 μg. The experiment was performed three times independently and GAPDH was used as a loading control. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 versus RANKL group.
Fig 5: Knockdown of uPAR decreased RANKL-induced osteoclast and actin ring formation. NC represents siRNA negative control, Si-1, Si-2, and Si-3 represent siRNAs that silence three different fragment of uPAR. BMMs were seeded in 96-well plates and transfected with three siRNAs and NC siRNA, respectively, and cultured with M-CSF (30 ng/mL) and RANKL (50 ng/mL) for 5 days. (A) Immunofluorescence and (B) TRAP staining was performed then. The experiment was performed three times independently.
Supplier Page from Abcam for Anti-uPA Receptor/U-PAR antibody