Fig 1: Immunohistochemical observations of SGLT2/SLC5A2 (A–G) and SGLT1/SLC5A1 (H, I) in human brain (A‐G, I) and kidney (H) tissues. (A–D) CPE cells (arrows, A–C) and ependymal cells (arrowheads) (A, B, D) show granular immunoreactivity for SGLT2/SLC5A2 in the cytoplasm. Inset in (B) indicates a magnified image of SGLT2/SLC5A2‐positive CPE cells. Some CPE (open arrow) (C) and ependymal cells (open arrowheads) (B, C) are negative for SGLT2/SLC5A2. (E, F) SGLT2/SLC5A2 immunohistochemistry without preabsorption reveals immunoreactivity in the cytoplasm of CPE (arrow) and ependymal (arrowhead) cells (E). Preabsorption of the anti‐SGLT2/SLC5A2 antibody with the recombinant antigen abolishes immunoreactivity in CPE (open arrow) and ependymal (open arrowhead) cells (F). (G) The immunoreactivity is undetectable in neurons, glia, and endothelial cells (double open arrows) in the lateral occipitotemporal cortex. (H) Immunohistochemical staining of human kidney samples with the anti‐SGLT1/SLC5A1 antibody reveals immunoreactivity on the BBM of the straight part of proximal tubuli. (I) SGLT1/SLC5A1 immunoreactivity is undetectable in CPE (open arrows) and ependymal (open arrowheads) cells. Case 1 (E–G), Case 2 (A), Case 3 (B), Case 4 (C, D, H, I). Scale bars: 100 μm (A, B, G, H, I), 20 μm (inset, B), 50 μm (C–F).
Fig 2: Human cellular expression of SGLT1. A Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) of snRNA-seq data of human heart cells from Koenig et al. 14 distinct cell types were identified, including cardiomyocytes. B SGLT1 expression (left UMAP) is enriched in cardiomyocytes. Conversely, SGLT2 expression (right UMAP) is scant. C UMAP of snRNA-seq data human cardiomyocytes (top UMAP) from Tucker et al. The bottom UMAP represents stratification of cardiomyocytes into the four chambers, with atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes resolving separately. Analysis of the relative expression of SGLT1 in atrial versus ventricular cardiomyocytes (D)
Fig 3: Ang II causes a redox-sensitive up-regulation of SGLT1 and 2 promoting their own expression in ECs. ECs are incubated with either (a, b) N-acetyl cysteine (NAC, an antioxidant, 1 mM) for 2 h, VAS-2870 (VAS, a NADPH oxidase inhibitor, 1 µM), indomethacin (INDO, a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, 30 µM) or myxothiazol (0.5 µM) + KCN (1 µM) + rotenone (1 µM; MKR, mitochondrial respiratory chain inhibitors) for 30 min, and (c, d) sotagliflozin (SOTA, 100 nM) or empagliflozin (EMPA, 100 nM) for 30 min before the addition of Ang II and the subsequent assessment of the expression level of SGLT1 and SGLT2 by Western blot analysis. Results are shown as representative immunoblots (upper panels) and corresponding cumulative data (lower panels). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM of n = 3. *P < 0.05 vs. control and #P < 0.05 vs. Ang II
Fig 4: Downregulation of MYBBP1A induces direct activation of PGC1α. (A) Downregulation of MYBBP1A by the expression of a specific shRNA. Cell lines were transfected with MYBBP1A shRNA (sh) or a scramble vector (V). After selection, cells were grown to 80% confluence, and proteins were extracted. The figure shows the western blot results of MYBBP1A expression in all cell lines and the quantification of MYBBP1A expression in cells expressing MYBBP1A shRNA (sh) related to the scramble vector (V). (B) PGC1α, SGLT1, p38, and p‐p38 (T180/Y182) levels at high‐ (4500 mg·L−1) and low‐glucose (100 mg·L−1) media were measured by WB. (C) A498, 786‐O, ACHN, and CaKi‐1 cells expressing the scramble vector (V) or MYBBP1A shRNA (sh) were cultured in low‐glucose (100 mg·L−1) media. SGLT1 and GLUT4 mRNA levels were measured by Q‐RT‐PCR. Graphs show mRNA levels of cells with reduced levels of MYBBP1A (sh) related to control cells (V).(D) A498, 786‐O, ACHN, and CaKi‐1 cells expressing the scramble vector (V) or MYBBP1A shRNA (sh) were cultured in low‐glucose (100 mg·L−1) media. HK2, PFKM, GAPDH, PGK1, PGAM1, and PKM mRNA levels were measured by Q‐RT‐PCR. Graphs show mRNA levels of cells with reduced levels of MYBBP1A (sh) related to control cells (V). (E) Quantification of HK2 and LDHA levels from xenografted tumors (N = 4) by Q‐RT‐PCR. Graphs show mRNA levels of cells with reduced levels of MYBBP1A (sh) related to control cells (V). (C, D) Graphs show the mean ± SD of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. (C–E) Statistical test: unpaired Student’s t‐test with Welch’s correction, *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Fig 5: Correlation between SGLT-1 (SLC5A1) and prognosis in PC. A and B Kaplan–Meier analysis of OS for patients with high vs. low SGLT-1 expression in IHC. C Kaplan–Meier analysis of OS for patients with high vs. low SGLT-1 (SLC5A1) mRNA expression using GEPIA. D Kaplan–Meier analysis of DFS for patients with high vs. low SGLT-1 (SLC5A1) mRNA expression using GEPIA. E Kaplan–Meier analysis of OS for patients with high vs. low SGLT-1 (SLC5A1) mRNA expression based on data downloaded from TCGA. F Kaplan–Meier analysis of PFS for patients with high vs. low SGLT-1 (SLC5A1) mRNA expression based on data downloaded from TCGA. (* for P < 0.05, ** for P < 0.01)
Supplier Page from Abcam for Anti-SGLT1 antibody