Fig 1: Effect of the enriched polysaccharide fraction on cell viability and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in DI-TNC1 (ATCC CRL-2005) cell line. (a) Dose–response curve of cell viability, expressed as percentage of cell survival in comparison with control. The horizontal dashed line, set at 60%, indicates the threshold of cell viability. (b) ROS production is expressed as relative percentage of photoluminescence intensity (PLI) versus positive control (H2O2). Values are mean ± SD of n = 3 experiments performed on different cell populations. Statistically significant decrease in comparison with H2O2. is indicated by asterisks (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s post hoc test; * p < 0.05).
Fig 2: Effect of the enriched polysaccharide fraction on cell viability and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in DI-TNC1 (ATCC CRL-2005) cell line. (a) Dose–response curve of cell viability, expressed as percentage of cell survival in comparison with control. The horizontal dashed line, set at 60%, indicates the threshold of cell viability. (b) ROS production is expressed as relative percentage of photoluminescence intensity (PLI) versus positive control (H2O2). Values are mean ± SD of n = 3 experiments performed on different cell populations. Statistically significant decrease in comparison with H2O2. is indicated by asterisks (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s post hoc test; * p < 0.05).
Fig 3: Effect of the enriched polysaccharide fraction on cell viability and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in DI-TNC1 (ATCC CRL-2005) cell line. (a) Dose–response curve of cell viability, expressed as percentage of cell survival in comparison with control. The horizontal dashed line, set at 60%, indicates the threshold of cell viability. (b) ROS production is expressed as relative percentage of photoluminescence intensity (PLI) versus positive control (H2O2). Values are mean ± SD of n = 3 experiments performed on different cell populations. Statistically significant decrease in comparison with H2O2. is indicated by asterisks (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s post hoc test; * p < 0.05).
Fig 4: Effect of the enriched polysaccharide fraction on cell viability and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in DI-TNC1 (ATCC CRL-2005) cell line. (a) Dose–response curve of cell viability, expressed as percentage of cell survival in comparison with control. The horizontal dashed line, set at 60%, indicates the threshold of cell viability. (b) ROS production is expressed as relative percentage of photoluminescence intensity (PLI) versus positive control (H2O2). Values are mean ± SD of n = 3 experiments performed on different cell populations. Statistically significant decrease in comparison with H2O2. is indicated by asterisks (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s post hoc test; * p < 0.05).
Fig 5: Effect of the enriched polysaccharide fraction on cell viability and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in DI-TNC1 (ATCC CRL-2005) cell line. (a) Dose–response curve of cell viability, expressed as percentage of cell survival in comparison with control. The horizontal dashed line, set at 60%, indicates the threshold of cell viability. (b) ROS production is expressed as relative percentage of photoluminescence intensity (PLI) versus positive control (H2O2). Values are mean ± SD of n = 3 experiments performed on different cell populations. Statistically significant decrease in comparison with H2O2. is indicated by asterisks (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s post hoc test; * p < 0.05).
Supplier Page from ATCC for DI TNC1