Fig 1: PGK1 interacts with VCP. (A) Immunoprecipitation (IP) combined with LC-MS/MS was used to identify PGK1 binding proteins, as well as the protein profiles and peptide segments of VCP. (B) Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assays were performed to investigate the interaction between PGK1 and VCP proteins in KBM5-T315I cells. (C) HEK-293T cells were transfected with Flag-PGK1/Flag-PGK1-K406A and HA-VCP/HA-VCP-E689A/HA-VCP-Q692A. Cell extracts were immunoprecipitated using anti-HA and anti-Flag antibodies, followed by immunoblotting. (D) Pulldown assays were conducted with His-PGK1 and GST-VCP proteins. Western blotting was performed using the indicated antibodies. (E) Rigid protein–protein docking between VCP (blue) and PGK1 (green) was performed using GRAMM-X software to investigate the interaction between the two proteins. The protein structures were obtained from the Uniprot, PDB, and Alphafold databases. (F) Western blot analysis assessed the knockdown efficiency of shVCP (KD) compared to the empty vector control (NC) in KBM5-T315I cells. Error bars: SEM, n = 3. Statistical significance of differences in mean values: ∗∗P < 0.01. (G) The combined effect of NG52 with imatinib on cell viability was evaluated after 24 h in VCP-KD-KBM5-T315I cells using the CCK-8 assay. Synergy score (δ-score) analysis was conducted using the web application SynergyFinder (https://synergynder.fimm.fi). Synergy score>10: synergy; <–10: antagonism.
Fig 2: PGK1 phosphorylates VCP at Ser 746. (A) Lactate production in KBM5-T315I cells after treatment with NG52 (0, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 μmol/L) for 24 h. (B) Cell viability changes in KBM5-T315I cells after treatment with PKM2-IN-1 (0, 0.375, 0.75, 1.5, 3 μmol/L) for 24 h, as detected by CCK-8 assay. (C) Flowchart illustrating the kinase-deficient mutant of PGK1 (T378P). (D, E) Phosphorylation reactions of VCP protein, PGK1-WT, and PGK1-T378P, VCP-WT, VCP-S746A, VCP-S748A in the presence or absence of ATP were conducted in a defined system. VCP phosphorylation was detected using a pan-phospho-serine/threonine antibody. (F) KBM5-T315I cells were treated with 50 μmol/L NG52 for 24 h. Cells were then immunoprecipitated with an anti-VCP antibody, followed by Western blot analysis. Phosphorylation was detected using a pan-phospho-serine/threonine antibody. (G–I) PGK1-OE and PGK1-KD cells were immunoprecipitated with an anti-VCP antibody, followed by Western blot analysis. Phosphorylation was detected using a pan-phospho-serine/threonine antibody; PGK1-KD cells were transfected with PGK1-WT cDNA or PGK1-T378P cDNA. WT and T378P cells were immunoprecipitated with an anti-VCP antibody, followed by Western blot analysis. Phosphorylation was detected using a pan-phospho-serine/threonine antibody. Error bars: SEM, n = 3. Statistical significance of differences in mean values: ∗∗P < 0.01.
Fig 3: Chemical screening and identification of CPU-216 directly bound to PGK1. (A) A summary of the search for small molecular compounds that target PGK1. (B) Inhibition of ATP production by candidate molecules at 10 μmol/L for 12 h in HEK-293T. (C) ATP production activity was assessed by adding various synthetic derivatives of flavonoids individually 6 μmol/L for 12 h in HEK-293T. (D) The ATP production of CPU-216 (0, 2, 4, 6 μmol/L) in HEK-293T at 12 h. (E) The inhibitory effect of CPU-216 (0, 7.8125, 15.625, 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, 500 nmol/L) on PGK1 enzyme activity. (F) The kinase profiling selectivity investigation of CPU-216 at a concentration of 0.5 μmol/L was carried out by ICE Bioscience using the ICEKP Kinome Panel, based on 80 kinase activity assays. (G) Direct binding of PGK1 to CPU-216. (H) CETSA melt curve of PGK1 in KBM5-T315I cells, with and without the presence of CPU-216 (6 μmol/L), after heat treatment. (I) Immunoblot analysis of PGK1 in KBM5-T315I cells treated with 0, 2, 4, and 6 μmol/L CPU-216 and pronase (1:50). (J) The interaction between CPU-216 and PGK1 was detected by Microscale Thermophoresis (MST). (K) Molecular docking analysis of CPU-216 and PGK1. (L) CML cells were treated with 0–80 μmol/L CPU-216 for 12 h, and cell viability was assessed using the CCK-8 assay. (M) KBM5-T315I-PGK1-WT, PGK1-OE, PGK1-KD, and PGK1-T378P cells were treated with 0–80 μmol/L CPU-216 for 12 h, and cell viability was assessed using the CCK-8 assay. (N) KBM5-T315I-VCP-KD cells were transfected with VCP-WT cDNA or VCP-E689A cDNA. WT and E689A cells were treated with 0–80 μmol/L CPU-216 for 12 h, and cell viability were assessed using the CCK-8 assay. (O) The effects of CPU-216 combination with imatinib or ponatinib, on the growth and viability of KBM5-T315I cells. Synergy score (δ-score) >10: synergy; <–10: antagonism. Error bars: SEM, n = 3. Statistical significance of differences in mean values: ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01.
Fig 4: In vivo studies demonstrated the anti-T315I-mutant CML activity of CPU-216. (A, B) The effects of imatinib, NG52, and CPU-216 on tumor growth in KBM5-T315I cell-bearing xenograft models were investigated, with measurements of tumor volume (Error bars: SEM, n = 5. Statistical significance of differences in mean values: ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01.). (C, D) The expression of LC3B-II and SQSTM1 in xenograft tumor tissue samples from KBM5-T315I cell-bearing mice was analyzed by immunofluorescence. Green or red fluorescence indicates the expression of LC3 and SQSTM1, respectively, while nuclei were stained with DAPI. Samples were evaluated using a confocal microscope (FV1000; Olympus) with FV10-ASW2.1 acquisition software (Olympus) at room temperature (original magnification 1000 ×; immersion objective 60 × with immersion oil type). (E) Mice were sacrificed after treatment with CPU-216, and their tissues were resected and fixed in 4% formalin for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) analysis. Images were acquired at 20 × magnification. (F, G) Cell proliferation in KBM5-T315I cells was assessed by Ki-67 staining after treatment with imatinib, NG52, and CPU-216 (Error bars: SEM, n = 3. Statistical significance of differences in mean values: ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01). (H) The expression levels of autophagy-related proteins under the treatment of NG52 and CPU-216. (I) In NG52 or CPU-216-treated tumor tissues, VCP phosphorylation was detected. (J, M) Effects of imatinib, CPU-216, and imatinib plus CPU-216 on the spleen weight in KBM5-T315I cells-bearing NOD/SCID mice were assessed. Representative photographs of the spleens were also displayed. (K) HuCD45 expression was examined in cells from the blood of each group of KBM5-T315I cells-bearing mice by flow cytometry. (L) Kaplan–Meier survival plots for KBM5-T315I cell-bearing NOD/SCID mice were presented (Error bars: SEM, n ≥3, compared with the control group. Statistical significance of differences in mean values: ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01).
Fig 5: Inhibition of PGK1 induces autophagy in T315I-mutant CML cells by increasing the deubiquitination of Beclin 1. (A, B) Expression levels of LC3B-II and Beclin 1 were analyzed by Western blot in PGK1-OE, PGK1-KD, PGK1-T378P cells, β-actin was used as a loading control. (C) Co-IP experiments demonstrated an interaction between VCP and Beclin 1. (D) Western blot analysis of the level of ubiquitination in KBM5-T315I cells treated with NG52 (50 μmol/L) and 10 μmol/L MG132 for 24 h. (E) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to observe lysosomal morphology following treatment with 50 μmol/L of NG52. (F, G) The expression levels of autophagy-related proteins under different concentrations of NG52 treatment. (H) Flow cytometric analysis of fluorescence intensity values of autophagy and GEOmean analysis. (I, J) Transcriptional expression of autophagy-related genes under different concentrations of NG52 treatment. (K) The effect of NG52 on LC3B accumulation in KBM5-T315I cells at different time points. (L) The expression levels of BCR-ABL were analyzed by Western blot in KBM5-T315I cells after NG52 (0, 12.5, 25, 50 μmol/L) treatment for 24 h in the presence or absence of 5 mmol/L 3-MA, β-actin was used as a loading control. (M) Expression levels of BCR-ABL were analyzed by Western blot in PGK1-OE, PGK1-KD, and PGK1-MT cells, β-actin was used as a loading control. Error bars: SEM, n ≥3. Statistical significance of differences in mean values: ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01.
Supplier Page from Abcam for Recombinant Human VCP protein (GST tag N-Terminus)