Fig 1: s-HBEGF governs sorafenib-induced hyper-keratosis.a HUVECs or HaCaT cells were exposed to 15 μM sorafenib for 24 h. The level of s-HBEGF in the supernatant or pro-HBEGF in total cell lysates was detected by western blot. b s-HBEGF concentrations in supernatants of HUVECs were measured by HBEGF peptide enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (n = 3). c Representative photos of ten patients with HFSR of various grades. d s-HBEGF concentrations in the serum of ten healthy volunteers and ten patients were measured by ELISA. e HaCaT cells were treated with s-HBEGF for 72 h. Cell survival rate was detected by SRB assay (n = 3). f RT-qPCR analysis of KRT1, KRT10, LORICRIN and IVL in HaCaT cells treated with s-HBEGF recombinant protein for 24 h (n = 3). g HaCaT cells were treated with CdMCTRL or CdMSORA in the presence of HBEGF neutralization antibody for 24 h. The transcription levels of KRT1, KRT10, LORICRIN and IVL were detected by RT-qPCR (n = 3). h HUVECs were transfected with scramble shRNA or HBEGF shRNA via lentivirus. The level of s-HBEGF in the supernatant or pro-HBEGF in total cell lysates was detected by western blot. i CdMCTRL or CdMSORA was collected from HUVECs transfected with scramble shRNA or HBEGF shRNA. HaCaT cells were treated with CdMCTRL or CdMSORA for 24 h. The transcription levels of KRT1, KRT10, LORICRIN and IVL were detected by RT-qPCR (n = 3). j–l Mice were treated with HBEGF neutralization antibody (100 ng/mouse) twice a week by i.v. and/or sorafenib (100 mg/kg) daily by i.g. for 30 days (n = 5/group). j Representative H&E staining and KRT5, KRT1, LORICRIN immunohistochemistry staining were performed on the paws of mice. Scale bar, 50 μm. k Quantitative analysis of epidermal hyper-keratosis assessed by measuring the stratum corneum thickness (n = 5/group). l s-HBEGF concentrations in the serum of each mouse were measured by ELISA (n = 5/group). Densitometric values are shown as optical density after ACTB normalization using Image J. Horizontal bars in (d), (k) and (l) represent mean values. The results in (b), (e), (f), (g) and (i) are presented as the mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test in (b), (d), (g) and (i). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with Dunn’s post hoc test when comparing the levels of KRT1 and IVL and with LSD post hoc test when comparing the levels of KRT10 and LORICRIN in (f) and with LSD post hoc test in (k) and (i). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. SORA sorafenib, CdM HUVECs conditional medium, CTRL control.
Fig 2: Classic SIRT1 inhibitor nicotinamide could relieve sorafenib-induced HFSR.a HaCaT cells were treated with or without 10 mM nicotinamide, followed by treatment with CdMCTRL or CdMSORA for 24 h. The transcription levels of KRT1, KRT10, LORICRIN and IVL were measured by RT-qPCR (n = 3). b–d Mice were treated with vehicle, sorafenib (100 mg/kg/day), nicotinamide (100 mg/kg/day) or sorafenib plus nicotinamide by intragastric administration for 30 days (n = 5/group). b Representative histopathology images show H&E-stained paws of the mice in control, sorafenib, nicotinamide or combination group. Representative immunohistochemistry images show KRT5, KRT1 or LORICRIN-stained paws of each group. Scale bar, 50 µm. c Thickness quantification of corneous layer of paws of the mice in control, sorafenib, nicotinamide or combination group (n = 5/group). d s-HBEGF concentrations in the serum of each mouse were measured by ELISA (n = 5/group). e Hands and feet of patients with sorafenib-induced HFSR showing hyper-keratosis before (left panel) and after (right panel) administration with 50 or 100 mg nicotinic acid (depending on HSFR grade) three times a day. f Diagnosis information of each patient. Horizontal bars in (c) and (d) represent mean values. The results in (a) are presented as the mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test in (a), and one-way ANOVA with LSD post hoc test in (c) and (d). n.s. no significance; *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001. NAM nicotinamide, SORA sorafenib, CdM HUVECs conditional medium, CTRL control.
Fig 3: SIRT1 is involved in sorafenib-induced hyper-keratosis.a HaCaT cells were transfected with non-targeting siRNA or siRNA targeting SIRT1. SIRT1 transcription level was detected by RT-qPCR (upper panel, n = 3) and the expression level of SIRT1 was determined by western blot (lower panel). b–e HaCaT cells were transfected with non-targeting siRNA or siRNA targeting SIRT1, followed by treatment with CdMCTRL or CdMSORA for 24 h (b, d) or treatment with or without s-HBEGF (2.5 ng/mL) for 24 h (c, e). The transcription levels of KRT1, KRT10, LORICRIN and IVL were measured by RT-qPCR (n = 3) (b, c). The cell survival rates were measured by SRB assay (n = 3) (d, e). f–i Mice were randomly divided into 4 groups. After injection of AAV1-shSirt1 adeno virus into the paws for 2 weeks, mice were treated with CMC-Na or sorafenib (100 mg/kg) daily by i.g. for 30 days (n = 5/group). f Representative western blot indicated the expression of SIRT1 in stratum corneum of mice in each group (n = 3/group). g Representative H&E staining and KRT5, KRT1, LORICRIN, SIRT1 immunohistochemistry staining were performed on the paws of mice. Scale bar, 50 μm. h Quantitative analysis of epidermal hyper-keratosis assessed by measuring the stratum corneum thickness. i s-HBEGF concentrations in the serum of each mouse were measured by ELISA (n = 5/group). Densitometric values are shown as optical density after GAPDH or ACTB normalization using Image J. Horizontal bars in (h) and (i) represent mean values. The results in (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) are presented as the mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with LSD post hoc test in (b), (c), (h) and (i) and with Dunn’s post hoc test in (a). n.s. no significance; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. SORA sorafenib, CdM HUVECs conditional medium, CTRL control.
Fig 4: The EGFR-JNK2 axis is involved in sorafenib-induced hyper-keratosis.a HaCaT cells were transfected with non-targeting siRNA or siRNA targeting EGFR. The transcription level of EGFR was detected by RT-qPCR (upper panel, n = 3) and the expression level of EGFR was determined by western blot (lower panel). b–e HaCaT cells were transfected with non-targeting siRNA or siRNA targeting EGFR, followed by treatment with CdMCTRL or CdMSORA for 24 h (b, d) or treatment with or without s-HBEGF (2.5 ng/mL) for 24 h (c, e). The cell survival rates were measured by SRB assay (n = 3) (b, c). The transcription levels of KRT1, KRT10, LORICRIN and IVL were measured by RT-qPCR (n = 3) (d, e). f Relevant EGFR downstream signaling pathways were examined by western blot. g Human primary keratinocytes were treated with s-HBEGF and the expression levels of p-JNK1/2, JNK2, p-JNK1 and JNK1 were assessed by western blot. h HaCaT cells or human primary keratinocytes were treated with or without sorafenib, CdMCTRL or CdMSORA. The expression levels of p-JNK1/2, JNK2, p-JNK1 and JNK1 were assessed by western blot. i HaCaT cells were transfected with non-targeting siRNA or siRNA targeting JNK2. JNK2 transcription level was detected by RT-qPCR (upper panel, n = 3) and the expression level of JNK2 was determined by western blot (lower panel). j–m HaCaT cells were transfected with non-targeting siRNA or siRNA targeting JNK2, followed by treatment with CdMCTRL or CdMSORA for 24 h (j, l) or treatment with or without s-HBEGF (2.5 ng/mL) for 24 h (k, m). The transcription levels of KRT1, KRT10, LORICRIN and IVL were measured by RT-qPCR (n = 3) (j, k). The cell survival rates were measured by SRB assay (n = 3) (l, m). Densitometric values are shown as optical density after ACTB or GAPDH normalization using Image J. The results in (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (i), (j), (k), (l) and (m) are presented as the mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with Dunn’s post hoc test in (a), (i) and when comparing the levels of KRT1 in (j) and with LSD post hoc test in (d), (e), (k) and when comparing the levels of KRT10, LORICRIN and IVL in (j). n.s. no significance; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. SORA sorafenib, CdM HUVECs conditional medium, CTRL control.
Fig 5: Vascular endothelial cells participate in sorafenib-induced hyper-keratosis.a HaCaT cells were treated with 0–15 μM sorafenib for 72 h. Cell survival rate was detected by SRB colorimetric assay (n = 3). b, c HaCaT cells were treated with 0–15 μM sorafenib for 24 h. The transcription levels of proliferation markers (b) and differentiation markers (c) were measured by RT-qPCR (n = 3). d The schematic diagram of conditional medium cell culture. e HaCaT cells were treated with supernatants from HUVECs exposed to 0–15 μM sorafenib (CdMCTRL or CdMSORA) for 72 h. Cell survival rate was detected by SRB colorimetric assay (n = 3). f, g HaCaT cells were treated with supernatants from HUVECs with or without sorafenib exposure (CdMCTRL or CdMSORA) for 24 h. f The transcription levels of KRT5 and KRT14 were measured by RT-qPCR (n = 3). g The transcription levels of KRT1, KRT10, LORICRIN and IVL were measured by RT-qPCR (n = 3). The results in (a), (b), (c), (e), (f) and (g) are presented as the mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test in (f) and (g). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with LSD post hoc test in (a) and when comparing the levels of KRT14 in (b) and KRT1, KRT10, LORICRIN in (c) and with Dunn’s post hoc test when comparing the levels of KRT5 in (b), IVL in (c). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. SORA sorafenib, CdM HUVECs conditional medium, CTRL control.
Supplier Page from Abcam for Anti-Loricrin antibody