Fig 2: Representative of the NAIP and GAPDH expression detected by FITC and Texas Red conjugated antibodies, respectively. (A) And (B) are images of HL.

Fig 3: The M.R of NAIP/GAPDH expression in low grade and High grade of NHLs of NHLs compared to control group. The NAIP protein expression between these groups was not statistically significant.

Fig 4: The M.R of NAIP/GAPDH expression between normal and RLH in the control groups. The NAIP protein expression between these groups was statistically significant (p = 0.012).

Fig 5: The M.R of NAIP/GAPDH expression in 23 cases of NHLs and 39 cases of control group. The NAIP protein expression between these groups was not statistically significant.