Fig 2: EREG mediates glucose uptake via PI3K with transient activation of ERK. (A) FD-glucose uptake in 3T3-L3 preadipocytes treated with or without EREG (50 ng/mL) and in the presence of inhibitors for EGFR-I (AG1478, 10 µM), EGFR and ErbB2 (AST-1306 or CI-1033 10 µM), dual IR/IGF-1R inhibitor (BMS 536924, 1 µM), and SRC-I, AZM475271, 1 µM) for 30 min. Cells were starved for 90 min before stimulation. Dashed line shows glucose uptake in the presence of insulin (Ins, 10 µg/mL). (B) FD-glucose uptake was measured in mouse 3T3-L1 preadipocytes with or without EREG (50 ng/mL) and inhibitors of MEK1/2 and PI3K (MEK1/2-I, U0126 10 µM, and PI3K-I, wortmannin 200 nM). Data (mean ± SD, n = 6) are shown as a percentage of control (Veh 100%). Unpaired Student’s t-test. (C) 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were stimulated with EREG at different concentrations (0–100 ng/mL) for 5 or 15 min. The total and phosphorylated levels of AKT, STAT3, STAT5, and ERK were measured by Western blot in duplicates. Data are shown in a representative Western blot. (D) The kinetics of pERK expression was quantified based on the Western blots. pAKT, p-STAT3, and p-STAT5 analysis are described in Figure S8. Pearson correlation analysis. (E) 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were stimulated with or without EREG or EGF (50 ng/mL, each) for 30 min in the presence and absence of EGFR inhibitor AST1306 (100 nM), and antibody against mouse LepR (Invitrogen, PA1-053, 10 µg/mL). For inhibition, cells were pre-treated 30 min before EREG and EGF stimulation. (F) FD-glucose uptake was measured in mouse 3T3-L3 preadipocytes pre-treated with either Veh (DMSO) or ERK inhibitors (U0126, SCH772984, or DEL 22379, each 10 µM in DMSO) for 40 min. Then, cells were treated with either Veh (PBS), mouse EREG (50 ng/mL), or mouse leptin (Lep, 200 ng/mL) for 80 min. Data are shown as a percentage of Veh-treated control (100%, n = 7 per group). Unpaired Student’s t-test. ns, not significant (p > 0.05).

Fig 3: Kinetics of the changes in LepR film thickness in the presence of leptin (A) or EREG (B). Film thickness was measured using QCM and quantified based on the binding kinetics to a gold sensor.

Fig 4: EREG regulated glucose uptake via binding with LepR in Lepob mice. (A) EREG and insulin tolerance test in Lepob mice (n = 5 per group) treated with a single intraperitoneal injection of insulin (0.012 IU/g BW, triangle dashed line) or EREG (80 ng/g BW, closed circles. Asterisks, significant (* p < 0.05) compared to glucose levels before EREG treatment. # Hashtag, significant difference in glucose levels 30 min after treatment with EREG or insulin. Unpaired Student’s t-test. (B) Area under the curve (AUC) quantification of insulin (hatched bar) and EREG (black bar) tolerance tests. Unpaired Student’s t-test, ns. (C) GTT kinetics were measured in Lepob mice (n = 5 per treatment) treated with a single injection of PBS (Veh, open circles) or EREG (closed circles). Student’s t-test. * p < 0.05 from comparison between control and EREG treated mice at each time point. (D) Area under the curve (AUC) quantification of insulin (hatched bar) and EREG (black bar) tolerance tests. Unpaired Student’s t-test. (E,F). Immunoprecipitation of LepR was performed with anti-EREG antibody using homogenates from subcutaneous fat (C) and visceral fat (D). Fat tissue was isolated from non-treated Lepob (Veh) as well as Lepob mice 15 min after injection of EREG (50 ng/mL).

Fig 5: EREG improved glucose tolerance in the absence of leptin in Lepob mice and exhibited no effect in LepR-deficient Leprdb mice. (A) Body weight of Lepob male mice in groups before and after treatment with Veh (PBS, white bar) or EREG (50 ng/g body weight (BW), black bar) for 26 days. Mice were on regular chow diet. Unpaired t-test, n = 7/group. ns, not significant. (B,C) Fat (B) and lean body (C) composition in same groups of mice at the end of the study was measured by Echo-MRI. Fat and lean mass are shown as % of the total weight (100%). (D,E) Glucose tolerance test (GTT) was performed in fasted Lepob mice treated with PBS (Veh, open circles) or EREG (closed circles) (n = 7 per group). GTT kinetics (D) and area under the curve (AUC) (E) are shown. Statistical significance was examined by ANOVA (D) and Student’s t-test (E). (F) Insulin levels in plasma in both mouse groups were measured by ELISA. Unpaired student’s t-test. (G) Weight before and after treatment of Leprdb male mice with Veh (PBS, white bar) or EREG (50 ng/g body weight (BW), black bar) for 4 weeks (n = 6 per treatment). Mice were on regular chow. Unpaired Student’s t-test, n = 6/group. (H,I) Fat (H) and lean body (I) composition (% of total weight) in the same groups of mice at the end of the study were measured by Echo-MRI. (J,K) GTT kinetics (J) and AUC (K) were obtained from Leprdb mice treated with PBS (Veh, open circles) or EREG (closed circles). ANOVA (J) and Student’s t-test (K). (L) Insulin levels in plasma in both mouse groups were measured by ELISA. Unpaired student’s t-test.