advertisement 
advertisement 
|
Confocal Microscopes: Getting More Data Out Of Your Images
Buying Tips
Oct 17 '06
 |
 |
 |
 |
Introduction |
 |
 |
| Pick up the latest issue of your favorite scientific journal and there’s a good chance that you will see images collected with a confocal microscope. If you’re in the market for one, make sure you consider the newest features offered by confocal companies, some examples of which you will find below. Whether you need ultra fast imaging, or the highest possible spatial resolution, there are some new developments in confocal imaging that may enhance your research. |
 |
 |
Data mining |
 |
 |
| “The major challenge all confocal microscope manufacturers face is to go beyond just producing spectacular images to produce images that are spectacular and rich with data content,” says Jeff Larson, confocal product manager at Nikon Instruments. “One way that this is done is to build instruments that acquire images at a much faster frame rate.” An important recent advance, according to Larson, is the combination of pinhole and slit scanning modes into one microscope, found in Nikon’s Live Scan Swept Field Confocal (SFC). Slit scanning gives faster acquisition, while pinhole mode gives higher spatial resolution. The Live Scan SFC is a field scanning confocal microscope that acquires images in pinhole mode at up to 80 frames/sec. In slit mode, the only limiting factor is the acquisition frame rate of the camera detector. Typical rates are from 30 to 400 frames/sec, “with higher frame rates possible on specialty cameras like the Roper Cascade 128,” says Larson. If you are having a hard time deciding which is more important to you, high spatial or temporal resolution, “there is now no reason to sacrifice either.”
A second way in which Larson believes that Nikon is meeting the challenge to produce data-rich images is through spectral confocal microscopy, which he sees as a significant recent confocal innovation. Nikon’s spectral imaging confocal microscope, the C1si, can acquire spectral data in 32 channels in a single pass, with three channel widths available. “It is possible to follow changes in the fluorescence emission peak over time as physiological conditions change,” explains Larson. “The 5 nm channel width is used to unmix or separate the signals from multiple fluorescent probes with overlapping fluorescence emission spectra. Two probes with emission peaks as close as 5 nm of each other can be easily separated. Three probes with emission peaks spread over a 25 nm range can also be separated. Because of this, it is no longer necessary to think in terms of blue, green, and red emitting fluorescent probes. Probes can now be selected on the basis of ease of transfection as is the case with fluorescent proteins, ease of loading as with calcium indicator dyes, resistance to photobleaching, or any other parameter important to the researcher, without having to consider the probes emission spectrum.” Larson says that with a 10 nm channel width, data can be acquired from up to six fluorescent probes in a single scan, with even more possible in two or three scans. |
 |
 |
Zeroing in on single proteins and organelles |
 |
 |
| According to Paul Orange, product leader of live cell imaging at PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, one of the major challenges in confocal microscopy today is “being able to study a single particle or organelle in a highly dynamic background of the hundreds or thousands of similar particles within the cell.” He believes that “developments in camera technology, such as the EMCCD cameras have really driven [confocal] technology forward. With the improvements in signal noise, sensitivity and speed, they now allow the researcher to see and record faint cellular events in real time.”
Orange thinks that a promising innovation is photoswitching (or photoconverting) proteins—proteins that change the color they fluoresce when illuminated with a laser. “They are a relatively recent development so I think that their full utility has yet to be seen, but to a certain extent, the equipment to fully make use of these proteins hasn’t been available.” Orange believes that such technology will make it easier to track organelles and proteins within cells: “Within our UltraVIEW range of confocal imagers, we have just launched the PhotoKinesis accessory, which allows you to do experiments like FRAP, FLIP and photoswitching on a spinning disk system.” |
 |
 |
Maximizing speed, minimizing photobleaching |
 |
 |
| Speeding up confocal imaging is a common refrain, particularly among those using fluorescent dyes that are sensitive to photobleaching. Mark Browne, market development manager for the microscopy system division at Andor Technology, explains that, “developments to provide an order of magnitude increase in speed of confocal imaging have been significant. These relate not only to the use of fast optical scanners and z-control, but also the extremely sensitive detectors such as CCD technology.” He claims that Andor’s Revolution products, with an optimized Yokogawa scan head and EMCCD detectors, result in high performance with low photo-bleaching. “EMCCD delivers up to 90% QE and the multi-point disk scanning technology provides the multiplex advantage for detection and peak laser power of about 0.1% of conventional point scanner,” says Browne. “Both systems can deliver up to 100 optical sections per second.”
Andor’s Revolution confocal systems use an optically enhanced Yokogawa CSU, Andor’s award-winning iXon+ EMCCD, and Andor’s laser combiner technology (ALC-400) for a combination of up to six laser lines (four solid state and two from an external Argon ion are possible). Other features are a fast piezo stage and objective movers, and the Andor iQ workstation. “Andor is the only spinning disk systems supplier to manufacture the key system components including software, which is a radical approach in this market,” says Browne. “[It] allows us to provide the highest specifications of stability, sensitivity, speed and synchronization. Revolution systems are not only highly specified, but also cost-effective, and have shown high levels of reliability in the field.” |
 |
 |
Imaging live cells and tissues |
 |
 |
| Duncan McMillan, advanced imaging microscopy specialist at Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, believes two major challenges face the confocal field today: “very deep (>500 microns) imaging in living organisms, [and] sensitivity and speed – particularly in live cell imaging applications.” Zeiss has attempted to address these challenges with the new LSM 5 LIVE. “It is a very high speed scanner (up to 120 frames per second at 512 x 512 pixels) that uses a unique line illumination approach,” says McMillan. “A second unique feature of this product is its linear CCD array detector which has a detection sensitivity several times higher than the photomultiplier tubes used in single point scanning microscopes.”
For those who image tissues in research or clinical applications, Glenn Smith, director of sales and marketing at Biomedical Photometrics Inc. (BPI), notes “a widespread need for microscopic imaging of large tissue specimens, fuelled by the rapid increase in research for understanding disease, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment. For example, fluorescent biomarkers will quantify pathology, both for diagnosis and treatment monitoring, and panoramic fluorescence microscopy can ultimately move into the clinic as these biomarkers are incorporated into the diagnostic and treatment regimen.”
Most people who look at specimens on slides first use the microscope to search for areas of interest using low power, then switch to high power, which has a very limited spatial view. Smith maintains that much can be missed with this method. One alternative is to use tiling microscopes, which create a high resolution digital image of the specimen by stitching together (using software) many small digital tiles. Tiling can be problematic, however, because the microscope’s focus can change from one tile to the next, resulting in artifacts.
Instead of tiling, BPI offers their confocal MACROscopeR technology. “An important difference between the MACROscopeR and a tiling microscope is the use of a telecentric, f theta laser scan lens instead of a microscope objective. This results in a viewing area that is 100 times that of a microscope with the same resolution. Multiple contrast modes such as transmission, brightfield, fluorescence, reflectance and differential phase contrast are available in one instrument.” BPI’s TISSUEscope applies the MACROscopeR technology to tissue imaging, and won a Frost & Sullivan Technology Innovation of the Year Award in 2005. |
 |
 |
Future developments |
 |
 |
| Confocal equipment in the offing includes a new technology by Nikon called Controlled Laser Excitation Microscopy (CLEM), to be introduced at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience in October 2006. The new CLEM technology will be available as an option for both the C1si and the C1-Plus, the latter being Nikon’s non-spectral point scanning confocal microscope. “CLEM closely regulates the illuminating laser power within each pixel to minimize photodamage in long time line experiments,” says Larson. “CLEM cuts off the illuminating beam in pixels where no signal above a user defined threshold is detected. It also cuts off the illuminating beam when the digitizer becomes saturated. This significantly reduces the laser power deposited in the specimen, dramatically reducing phototoxicity.” |
 |
Caitlin Smith
Contributing Writer
Related Product Links:

Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopes
Spinning Disk Confocal Microscopes
Time-Resolved Fluorescence Confocal Microscopes
More Articles:

Buying Tips Archives
Product Reviews
Feature Articles
|