Anti-RIP1 Antibody (4926)

Surgery
University of Pittsburgh
Research Scientist

Overall

Quality of Results

Ease-of-Optimization

What do these ratings mean?
Write a Review

Company:

Cell Signaling Technology

Product Name:

anti-RIP1 antibody

Catalog Number:

4926

Based on literature mining, protein candidates are profiling to indicate if they are involved in mouse lung ischemia. RIPK1 antibody from Cell Signaling Technology is relatively expensive while the quality is generally good.

To screen the proteins complicated in mouse lung ischemia, the lungs from B6 wild type mice were procured and subject to cold ischemia for 24 hours. The lung tissue lysates were made by adding lysis buffer [1% SDS, 10 mmol/L Tris-Cl (pH 7.6), 20 μg/μL aprotinin, 20 μg/μL leupeptin, and 1 mmol/L 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenosulfonyl fluoride] after homogenizing with mortar and pestle in liquid nitrogen. The supernatants were obtained after centrifugation at 12000 g for 15 minutes at 4. The protein concentrations were determined using the Bicinchoninic Acid Protein Assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Fiften micrograms of protein were separated on SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. After blocking, the membranes were incubated with the appropriately diluted primary antibody at 4°C overnight. After washing with TBST, the membranes were incubated with appropriately diluted HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 hour. Proteins were detected with the enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotechnology, Inc., Piscataway, NJ).

Experimental Design and Results Summary

Applications

Western Blot

Sample

Mouse lung

Primary Incubation

1/1000

Blocking Agent

5% milk

Secondary Incubation

1/1000

Tertiary Incubation

1 hour at room temperature

Detection

ECL

Results Summary

The expression levels of RIP1 was increased after 24-hour cold ischemia

DOI or PMID #

N/A

Additional Notes

N/A

Related Categories

Image Gallery

Summary

The Good

The antibody works

The Bad

N/A

The Bottom Line

The system worked

Share your experience with other scientists. Write a Review! »

Join the discussion