Good Way to Isolate Neutrophils From Lungs

University of California, San Diego
Department of Pediatrics
Postdoctoral Fellow

Overall

Quality of Results

Ease-of-Optimization

What do these ratings mean?
Write a Review

Company:

Miltenyi Biotec

Product Name:

Anti-Ly-6G MicroBead Kit, mouse (MACS)

Catalog Number:

130-092-332

This product was used to isolate neutrophils from Mtb infected mouse lungs. It is not 100% pure, but I think its the only way to do this without having to sort. Pretty easy protocol and reliable / consistent. Got between 70 - 97% purity.

Experimental Design and Results Summary

Application

Positive selection of neutrophils

Starting Material

Mtb infected murine lungs

Protocol Overview

Mice were infected with Mtb, lungs isolated and single cell suspensions obtained by digestion at 37C with collagenase and DNAse, then pushed through a 70um filter (MACS smart strainer). I lysed RBC (but I dont think this is necessary, but wanted to keep my protocol consistent) and then followed the MACS protocol - bound Ab, beads, then put through an LS column. I did do the optional step of putting the positively selected cells through a second column, this increased purity.

Tips

Protocol would probably be better if I did the dead cell removal kit first, but I didn't have it available at the time, so I haven't tried that.

Results Summary

Between 60 - 95% purity. My samples were from highly infected, inflamed, and damaged murine lungs (Mtb infection) and contain a ton of different inflammatory cells and dying cells, which undoubtedly leads to contamination / problems. There is a clear trend of "contaminating" cells in my preps. The sample (left) that is 62% pure is a wildtype mouse that doesn't have much inflammation or neutrophils in the lungs. The middle sample is a mouse that develops slightly more inflammation and neutrophils in the lungs (82% pure). Finally, the right mouse is a strain that develops severe neutrophillic infiltrate, which eventually takes over the lung space and kills the mouse during infection (97% pure). So, I think these differences result from a standard amount of "contamination" and the higher purity prep (right) is simply a result of the fact that the vast majority of the cells in that mouse are neutrophils, so while some may be non-specifically isolated, it just happens to be what I am interested in. This trend is consistent over 5 strains tested and over 30 samples prepped. But, given the severe inflammatory response and high percentage of dying cells present, this product meets all reasonable expectations for a column based purification. As I noted, it would probably be better to do a dead cell removal kit first, but I haven't tried that yet.

Additional Notes

The company recommends the gentle MACS cell disruptor, which is probably better, but my samples needed to be processed in the BSL3 and so that wasn't an option.

Image Gallery

Summary

The Good

Works to isolate neutrophils from lungs, without the need to do FACS.

The Bad

Expensive product, can't reuse the columns so it gets very pricey.

The Bottom Line

Overall, the best choice given my options. I have limited access to a BSL3 sorter to do live cell isolation (since I work with Mtb), and it's nice to be able to run 8 samples at once (with 2 Miltenyi MACS Magnets - I could do more if I had more magnets.) I am happy with the product and results. Also, the protocol is very straightforward, and the buffer can be homemade (I think its PBS, BSA and EDTA) so that saves a little money. I've also had great interactions with customer service and our sales rep - they all are (or sound like) scientists instead of sales people, they know the product and the logic behind it, and when asked questions, provide actual data of "we tested this and found this was better for this reason" or "we tested that and it didn't make a difference" and so I am a fan of the company. Also they are very willing to send samples for products (I didn't want to spend over $500 on a kit to test it out because I had doubts it was going to work on inflammed lungs).

Join the discussion